$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

šŸ”„ Gambling mathematics - Wikipedia

Of blackjack wiz odds above
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • Licensed and certified online casino
  • Players welcome!
  • 100% safe and secure
  • 97% payout rates and higher

Wiz of odds blackjack

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth

Play slots for real money

  1. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
  2. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  3. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Monthly drawings
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Slot tournaments
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Unlimited free play
Join the Club!

Allowed Soft 17: Dealer Stands Dealer Hits This is our first blackjack game and. By clicking "analyze" you can determine the odds for any situation according toĀ ... Click to Play!

Below is from a table found on Wizard of Odds listing the probabilities of dealer make hands for 6 Deck s17 DS RSA from the following numberĀ ... Click to Play!

Free Bet Blackjack - Wizard of Odds Online Blackjack Now!. Always split 9's unless the dealer is showing a 7.If the total value of all your cards in one round isĀ ... Click to Play!

Or option B with a 55% chance perfect blackjack strategy odds of. 4-Deck to 8-Deck Blackjack Strategy - Wizard of Odds 316 Ɨ 722 - 20k - gif. Click to Play!


Page not found – Haifa


Blackjack for Blood: The Card-Counters' Bible, and Complete Winning Guide [Bryce Carlson] on. Whether You want to even up the odds with The house or become a blackjack Professional this is the book for you.. Sold by: Wiz Books.
Discussions about blackjack, page1.. What does the Wizard mean as a win%. Thread starter: Bucky. Bucky. Blackjack Tablemaster Odds. Pages: 1 2 ThreadĀ ...
Card Counting the King's Bounty Blackjack Side Bet, 6 Decks. Organic Roulette Experiment - Wizard of Odds. I couldn't find the SD for different types of RouletteĀ ...


Eight Tips to Become a Winning Blackjack Player: Part One - with Blackjack Expert Henry Tamburin


Blackjack Switch Basic Strategy Research - Blackjack and Card Counting Forums Wiz of odds blackjack


Keep the Wizard's H17 chart handy, or use that.. when going from S17 to H If your canada doesn't have them you can print one from the Wizard of Odds site.
wizard, i saw your strategies for a certain "magical ocean" bubble slot. your analysis was only for 4 lines. i found this same exact game, but itĀ ...
Our guest this week is Mike Shackleford of the Wizard of Odds, and Wizard of Vegas websites. Mike is a former cohost of Gambling With anĀ ...



Hold'em Blackjack: How 7-Card Charlie is Worthless


wiz of odds blackjack
Our exclusive Las Vegas Blackjack survey provides you with a complete. was determined by using the Wizard of Odds Blackjack Calculator.
Wizard Of Odds Blackjack Bet Spread! Demonio Slot Free Download. Change Your Bets As The True Count Rises And Falls!

wiz of odds blackjack For https://krimket.com/blackjack/ios-blackjack-game.html better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Two basic strategies for this game can be found check this out Arnold Snyder's Blackjack Forum Online site: And another one by "The Wizard of Odds" Mike Shackleford can be found here: Both differ from standard H17 strategy, and there are minor disagreements between the two.
Time to monkey around with it.
The reason BJ Switch strategy differs from standard BS is the push-on-dealer-22 rule.
It's hard to visualize how this would make a difference, but apparently it does.
So I used my CVData simulator to find an ideal basic strategy.
Methodology: First, I programmed the push-on-22 rule into a CVData sim, by calling it a negative bonus, where if the player doesn't bust and the dealer busts with 22, the player pays his win back to the house.
What an ugly rule!
Then I applied the brute-force method of deducing plays.
It works like this- you start with the hit-or-stand 16 plays, have two players playing agains the dealer, with the only difference being one always hits on 16, and one always stands on 16.
By subtracting the resulting win rates for each player on the 16 plays, you can determine against what dealer upcard it is better to hit or to stand.
Then you run another sim for the 15's and the 14's, down to the 12's.
This is arduous but necessary.
Once you have the correct basic strategy for hit-or-stand, you do the same thing with the hard and soft doubles.
You can do these all at once, just one sim.
Finally, you run another sim for the splits.
At this point you have enough information to provide a complete basic strategy for the game.
Note: these results do not take into account the benefit of switching!
That's a whole different topic, but it should be independent of the way you play each hand after you have switched, which is the purpose wiz of odds blackjack a basic strategy.
I ran a sim comparing the Monkey Basic Strategy vs.
I had wondered where you went after CC.
Wouldn't it be easier to write a recursive algorithm for this?
Loop through each possible player hand, and for each hand, test each dealer upcard, and for each dealer upcard, test each dealer downcard, and for each dealer downcard, test each possible next card or stand or bustand for each next card, test the next card, etc, etc.
That way you'll get an EXACT count of, for each have vs.
Wouldn't it be easier to write a recursive algorithm for this?
Loop through each possible player hand, and for each hand, test blackjack probability dealer upcard, and for each dealer upcard, test each dealer downcard, and for each dealer downcard, test each possible next card or stand or bustand for each next card, test the next card, etc, etc.
That way you'll get an EXACT count of, for each have vs.
It took me wiz of odds blackjack a couple of hours to do it on a sim.
What you're proposing is a combinatorial analysis, accurate for sure but not easy.
It took a lot of work to develop the first BS for blackjack using such methods.
I added a blackjack switch decision calc to source website a few days ago at.
I noticed that the switching decisions differ in continue reading cases from the calc on Wizard of Odds at.
I believe the reason for this is the Wizard of Odds calc assumes an infinite deck and see more EVs before the dealer peaks for blackjack.
Note that the EVs used in the Wizard of Odds calc are not the one in the table listed on the site, which assume 8 decks and are after dealer peaks for BJ.
And congratulations on your POM.
But then he won't say what that is.
I have written him about counting tags.
With the BJ paying double and the push on 22, I would think the tags would be different.
Do you have any thoughts about counting BJ Switch and possible index plays?
This is one of the games at a favorite comp station.
Maverick AM - Would your BS be the same for the Playtech game?
AKA23 - would u have a list of 5 or 10 plays that give different switch decisions than the Wiz website?
Maverick - Do you mean Geoff Hall?
In the game u play is it in Nevada?
If not, what would u estimate to be the HA?
AKA23 - would u have a list of 5 or 10 plays that give different switch decisions blackjack games flash the Wiz website?
The only differences are hands that are extremely close calls.
The calc on WOO says swap to create 18 and 14.
My calc says keep them and split 8s to create 8, 8, and 16.
However, if you add up the EVs on the WOO BJS page, you get the numbers listed below, suggesting standing is the preferred option.
In the game u play is it in Nevada?
If not, what would u estimate to be the HA?
Yes the dealer peek rule is in effect for U.
The house edge is 0.
Maverick Yes the dealer peek rule is in effect for U.
The house edge is 0.
Maverick Oh yes, back when Playtech was dealing it that way, there were also offering 0.
I made a ton on money on that game and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
See that- they got greedy with the Click to see more rule and it came back to get them because they didn't really understand what they were doing.
Too bad they now deal it American style.
Hi All, As there seems to be some interest in this wiz of odds blackjack I'll throw my 2 cents worth in.
I used a revamped version of 'SBA' to get each 'switch' decision along with the corresponding house edge.
Further analysis has been done by a University professor using numerical analysis and the results were very https://krimket.com/blackjack/blackjack-app-trainer.html to what I had.
I now have the following house edges that I believe are very close :- Internet version 6 deck 0.
I think that WOO changed his tables to show this but I'm not sure.
For example, I would :- Stand on 14 vs 2 at +1 or higher Double 9 vs 5 at +1 or higher Double 11 link 9 at +1 or higher Other adjustments could be made for other fairly close plays, including some of the soft doubling.
Furthermore, some close 'switches' could be adjusted according to the count.
Maybe 'switches' affect by counts of -2 up to +2 could be memorized but rules blackjack ace asking a lot and the changes in play would be easier and more beneficial in my opinion.
I could get 'SBA' revamped again to produce tags for the plays but I haven't done so yet.
If the game starts to expand across the USA then I am looking at producing a book that would contain this information.
Incidentally, I'm currently ay Lake tahoe, heading back to Las Vegas on Tuesday.
Furthermore, ther are 16 other casinos, in other states, that want the game, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed that the game will expand quite rapidly this year.
Best regards Geoff Easier, hell no!
It took me just a couple of hours to do it on a sim.
What you're proposing is a combinatorial analysis, accurate for sure but not easy.
It took a lot of work to develop the first BS wiz of odds blackjack blackjack using such methods.
Internet version 6 deck 0.
Best regards Geoff Geoff, or anyone else, Do you know how much % advantage each true count is worth using, say, hi-lo tags?
This is needed for bet sizing.
Geoff, or anyone else, Do you know how much % advantage each true count is worth using, say, hi-lo tags?
This is needed for bet sizing.
Variance is similar to regular Blackjack.
Each true count indice is worth approx' 0.
Variance is similar to regular Blackjack.
Each true count indice is worth approx' 0.
I had guessed the variance would be a little higher relative to the initial bets because of all the extra doubling and splitting you end up with.
When I was playing it online it was a neat way to fulfill wagering requirements quickly.
When you say true count, do you mean with the High-Low system tags?
I've been attacking the game with Zen, because the derated ace should properly reflect the decreased value of the ace due to the 1:1 payoff on naturals and H17 rule.
But on the other hand, the increased frequency of hard doubles will give the ace some of it's value back, yes?
Has anyone worked out the proper EOR's of the cards yet?
I had guessed the variance would be a little higher relative to the initial bets because of all the extra doubling and splitting you end up with.
When I was playing it online it was a neat way to fulfill wagering requirements quickly.
When you say true count, do you mean with the High-Low system tags?
I've been attacking the game with Zen, because the derated ace should properly reflect the decreased value of the ace due to the 1:1 payoff on naturals and H17 rule.
But on the other hand, the increased frequency of hard doubles will give the ace some of it's value back, yes?
Has anyone worked out the proper EOR's of the cards yet?
I tried various standard count systems and found that they all came out with similar results.
I think that the balanced 'Zen' was where I got the edges from.
I don't know click here who has done EOR's for the game although this would definitely be a step in the right direction to devise an appropriate count system.
I've been attacking the game with Zen, because the derated ace should properly reflect the decreased value of the ace due to the 1:1 payoff on naturals and H17 rule.
But on the other hand, the increased frequency of hard doubles will give the ace some of it's value back, yes?
Has anyone worked out the proper EOR's of the cards yet?
How do you feel about the two?
I thought it might be more significant because of the push 22 rule.


How to Bet in Blackjack


462 463 464 465 466

wizard, i saw your strategies for a certain "magical ocean" bubble slot. your analysis was only for 4 lines. i found this same exact game, but itĀ ...


COMMENTS:


21.12.2019 in 01:39 Kazrakasa:

In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



22.12.2019 in 17:33 Malall:

This valuable message



21.12.2019 in 21:18 Mern:

I apologise, I can help nothing. I think, you will find the correct decision.



28.12.2019 in 02:25 Kagarisar:

Anything.



20.12.2019 in 02:38 Zuzahn:

This message, is matchless))), it is very interesting to me :)



26.12.2019 in 16:09 Ninris:

The excellent answer, I congratulate



25.12.2019 in 11:57 Nitaur:

In my opinion you are not right.



27.12.2019 in 00:01 Jumi:

I apologise, but it not absolutely approaches me. Perhaps there are still variants?



28.12.2019 in 02:17 Zusho:

You are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



28.12.2019 in 08:12 Shaktitaxe:

What would you began to do on my place?



25.12.2019 in 04:18 Voodookus:

Your idea is useful



27.12.2019 in 01:15 Visida:

I consider, that you commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



28.12.2019 in 07:53 Femuro:

Do not take in a head!



24.12.2019 in 12:39 Mazulrajas:

I am am excited too with this question. Tell to me please - where I can read about it?



23.12.2019 in 15:48 Goltinos:

I think, that you are not right. Write to me in PM.



19.12.2019 in 20:27 Arashishura:

In it something is and it is good idea. I support you.



20.12.2019 in 09:44 Gardataur:

Instead of criticism advise the problem decision.



26.12.2019 in 17:05 Yozshukree:

Bad taste what that



23.12.2019 in 22:30 Turg:

I am sorry, that I interfere, but you could not paint little bit more in detail.



24.12.2019 in 18:54 Daimi:

It is cleared



24.12.2019 in 16:53 Negal:

You are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it.



27.12.2019 in 05:49 Samugal:

Good question



19.12.2019 in 03:47 Kajigal:

As the expert, I can assist. Together we can find the decision.



22.12.2019 in 01:08 Meztizragore:

I think, that you commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



19.12.2019 in 11:54 Voodookazahn:

It is removed



20.12.2019 in 07:56 Kajilkis:

You are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.



19.12.2019 in 23:10 Akinogami:

I can recommend to visit to you a site on which there is a lot of information on this question.




Total 27 comments.