Online BLACKJACK VIP Dealer £100 MINIMUM BETS PART 2 Real Money Play at Mr Green Online Casino
The pari-mutuels in South Florida have recently introduced these machines at their slot-only casinos in an attempt to woo some BJ players away from the local indian casino which permits card-based table games.
I have found some sources claiming these machines are fair, in that they operate with a random card distribution, which is shuffled after each player.
Yet other sources I have found, including one article which interviews a casino manager, state they are based on a RNG, which determines a win or loss prior to being dealt.
I have grown quite wary of these machines after repeated 3 and 4 card dealer deals to 20 and 21.
So is this like a slot machine?
What exactly is going on here?
If it is a RNG, what implications do surrender which is offereddouble down, and split introduce?
Normally, gaming laws state that a video game that simulates a dealt deck must replicate a dealt deck.
The RNG knows the cards it is dealing but your play can affect results and the odds.
It should be the same odds as a normal blackjack game.
There are exceptions: some machines are defined as Class II Video Poker machines such as Indian casinos in New York and therefore the draw you receive is not random but matches a set payout percentage no matter how odds on virtual blackjack play, you would get the payout you receive.
That would mean that it is pre-determined, which does seem interesting given the fact odds on virtual blackjack you do have some control over those machines with doubling and click like.
Here is a post where we were discussing those machines.
Quote: I have grown quite wary of these machines after repeated 3 and 4 card blackjack table and poker deals to 20 and 21.
Welcome to the wonderful world of the Shufflemaster.
My last time at Dover Downs, Delaware, I was witness to a 7 card dealer 21 that included 4 aces.
The next hand included two aces.
At first I was irritated, I am now amused.
In any odds on virtual blackjack, be wary of the Royal Match.
In Delaware, at least, the low level match pays out at 2.
The mere option of being able to double or surrender means it's impossible for the machine to operate like a slot machine with some predetermined outcome the moment you hit deal.
Further, shufflemaster does not manufacture such a game.
The article is wrong.
What IS likely is that they use seperate shoes for each player and the dealer, which often skirts the laws of what a 'table game' is and makes it in the same realm as video poker.
In this case, you are able to make decisions, but your decisions in no way affects other players or the dealer.
You are completely playing your 'own' game.
And as others have stated, any video representation of cards must be fair.
If they aren't, its no different than dealing from a short deck or dealing seconds and these machines would certainly be illegal assuming there is any kind of gaming regulation in florida.
Of course these machines do use a RNG, but they are only used to shuffle odds on virtual blackjack generate on order for the virtual deck s of cards.
I really think the casino manager quoted was confusing the fact that it has a RNG and a specific house edge with payback as it applies to slot machines, which actually isn't all that different.
But you do make decisions that will affect things, blackjack is impossible otherwise.
I found an interesting long document, which is a declaratory statement from the Florida Division of Pari-Mutuel wagering which states, among other things that unlike blackjack, the machine will pay out at around 97%.
For this odds on virtual blackjack be the case, and given the fact that the machine pays 3-2 on BJ, allows surrender, doubling, splitting aces onceand S17, something must be off with the RNG, right?
If it truly was at least partially player-decision outcome determinative, wouldn't the payout have to be higher.
I'm not sure of the rules regarding posting links, but here is the aforementioned document: I scanned through the decision you just posted.
I'm pretty sure the machine operates like the card game.
They bent over backwards arguing it didn't 'replicate' blackjack, but odds on virtual blackjack used arguments like i other players couldn't influence your outcome, and ii you can't count it.
Notice that the 97% payback was mentioned in the same sentence as "traditional blackjack ranges from 75-91%" on page 6.
This makes me think the 'payback' is actually more like the hold.
Something doesn't add up, but I'm pretty sure, based on other parts of the decision, that the game is a fair representation of blackjack what are the rules for delaware VBJ?
No Bust Blackjack Strategy: Does it Work?
Blackjack is the most popular card game at every online casino.. or split and know you've made the right play to maximize your odds of winning.. seat and are not necessarily available 24/7 like a virtual Blackjack table is.
I am sorry, that I interrupt you, but you could not give more information.
Many thanks for the help in this question, now I will not commit such error.
I am very grateful to you. Many thanks.
I am final, I am sorry, but it not absolutely approaches me. Who else, what can prompt?
You are not right. I am assured. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM.
Instead of criticising write the variants is better.
I think, that you are not right. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Analogues are available?
You commit an error. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It agree, the useful message
Very valuable message
Bravo, what necessary words..., a magnificent idea
In my opinion. You were mistaken.
I congratulate, remarkable idea and it is duly
I am ready to help you, set questions. Together we can find the decision.
It that was necessary for me. I Thank you for the help in this question.
It yet did not get.