How to Count Cards (and Bring Down the House)
All the 6-8 deck games were full up tonight.
So I decided to give single and double deck a whirl.
Pitch games were way more fun than playing from a shoe, but ultimately, it felt like counting didn't really help much.
The game never swung the true count past 1 or -1.
Which seems very likely in almost every game since there are so few cards However, I did look up double deck strategies and came across this list of basic strategy deviations specifically for double deck Thoughts?
Most of these will be impossible to remember, but I could see myself getting down the 2-3 card exceptions.
And they seem more helpful than keeping a count If I find a double deck game with good rules and deep penetration, I am a lethal assassin.
Depending on your goals, you need to basic strategy blackjack double deck certain things that you can't do on a shoe.
With thousands of hours of playing experience, I have experienced hugely better results on double than 6 deck.
But you have to do things slightly different than a 6 deck game, but I am not going to lay those out here.
But a good double deck game is like opening the cash till and walking away.
I think my favorite DD game is the high limit room in Treasure Island; S17, DAS, DA, and 60-70% penetration.
Counting a double deck has the advantage in that the running count in it has more strength than an equal running count in a 6D basic strategy blackjack double deck />From what I can tell, that page is just cases where composition-dependent strategy diverges from total-dependent strategy regular BS.
I would imagine than for the large part counting indices do better than just click for source composition-dependent strategy as laid out.
I think you are best off without further research using $5 blackjack southern california exceptions only when you don't use an index for that play.
You would need to do your own research or ask Shackleford for his data to determine how much EV you get from using these.
Most of your value in counting still comes from betting strategy, so to forsake counting entirely for BS + these exceptions is probably -EV.
This is actually a topic that doesn't come around too often.
I feel bad about letting this post get neglected so please feel free to ask me anything about what I have said or the topic at hand.
What is your own experience in playing single and double deck?
Did counting help you any?
Honestly, I don't have enough experience in these particular games to make these kinds of assumptions.
But these are my initial impressions of the two single and double deck and they both seem MUCH harder to work as an advantage player 6 or 8 deck shoes, even though it seems blackjack practice because there are less cards to count through.
I have probably counted less than 10 hours of DD in a bit of a half assed fashion when first starting out but pen and table limits really made it unworthwhile for me to keep local tables as an option.
I think your second question suggests that you are paying attention to short term results when counting.
I'm sure counting helped, as it does with my bread and butter shoe games.
I have barely seen counting 'help' at the tables.
Sure I can see the weather forecast, but like a 60% chance of rain often enough the most probable thing isn't what happens.
I know counting gives me an advantage because theoretically it should, and I have confidence that I execute my approach accurately.
Number of decks is an important aspect of a rule set and definitely changes some particulars.
However, all the same counting reasoning applies.
Even basic strategy changes from 6D to DD.
Playing your same approach as a 6D at a DD could give you a playable game but it's sloppy and doesn't require much extra learning you just memorize new decisions and use a different ramp.
I think SD and DD require the same amount of work a 6D when you leave heat concerns out of the picture.
It's almost the same type of different from moving from a 6D H17 nSurr game to a 6D S17 ES game.
Most experienced counters prep themselves for a variety of rule sets as needed or just in case.
This is something I mean to do once I actually travel to play.
My city only has a few casinos with the exact same rule sets all the same casino group and we are a bit out of the way.
My ramps are something that probably won't vary across games with the same number of decks but at the end of the day I'll basic strategy blackjack double deck software to really guide that decision.
None of this was about composition dependent strategy oh well but if you are counting, you might as well just ignore that page and treat it as a BJ curiosity when you feel like researching that for fun.
It's not really anything that will help your game much compared to other things you could do.
Thank you for that!
I think I understand dd and single deck a little better now.
On the https://krimket.com/blackjack/buy-blackjack.html of composition dependent strategy; you seem interested in it, but also against it.
Is it something you tried personally that didnt work out?
Or do you believe there are only certain CD strategies that do work.
I see CDS as a slightly better EV-wisebut more unwieldy, add-on to TDS i.
However if you use full indices, that is you use an index for every decision, then there isn't any room for either CDS or TDS.
Indices replace the need for basic strategy.
All three playing strategies use the same principles.
CDS differs from TDS in that the hands are more fine-grained.
A hand isn't 16 v 10 but 10,6 v 10 or 7,9 v 10 and so on.
Indices differ from both in that information outside the hand, gathered via counting, is considered.
The reason why I refer to CDS as a plural is that in practice not sure I've ever heard of anyone who uses a non-trivial amount of CDS is you'll probably limit the scope of the situations it covers.
A pure CDS would include every single possible non-busted hand you could get.
Most of the time when CDS is employed it's used as an add-on to TDS as an exception to BS.
For example, some basic strategy cards will have a little asterisk for 16v10 that tells you to stay 3 card 16s.
While it doesn't refer to a specific composition it rules out the 10,6 combo.
I have never used CDS beyond that one exception I just mentioned.
Again, you can't really see if stuff works or doesn't work in blackjack.
The variance masks the difference in advantage from different strategies within a certain degree with reasonableness.
If I hit a bad streak when I return to counting I won't think to myself counting didn't work out.
My session didn't work out, but it's a quintessential part of gambling for results not to be certain and not any fault of my approach.
Likewise, if I doubled downed on all my 12s and made a bunch of money, I'd never say that that strategy worked out for me.
I hope I haven't been sounding pedantic about this rant link whether strategies have 'helped' or 'didn't work out' but I think my point is that this kind of phrasing suggests you look at the wrong things to basic strategy blackjack double deck or invalidate an approach.
Blackjack Session - When to Double and when to hit? - NeverSplit10s
Play Double Deck Blackjack online.. where two decks of cards are used, besides obviously following the basic strategy like in any other blackjack variant.
Yes, really. So happens. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.
You have hit the mark. It is excellent thought. It is ready to support you.
I can not take part now in discussion - it is very occupied. Very soon I will necessarily express the opinion.
I think, that you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM.
You have hit the mark. I like this thought, I completely with you agree.
I join. All above told the truth. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.
Bravo, you were visited with simply excellent idea
Bravo, you were visited with simply magnificent idea
I consider, that you commit an error. Let's discuss it.
Do not despond! More cheerfully!
You are not right. I am assured. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.